Graduating Into Debt: Credit Card Marketing on Maryland College Campuses
Executive Summary
Not long ago, credit cards
were reserved for those who could prove that they had the income and self-discipline
to manage credit. A college student could not obtain a credit card unless a
parent co-signed.
In the past 10 years, the
stereotype of the financially struggling student has been replaced by the image
of the credit card wielding student who wants for nothing. Credit cards have
given students financial freedom—freedom to purchase clothes, electronic
equipment, and exotic spring vacations. But many question whether that freedom
has come at too high a price—increased bankruptcy filings among young adults,
students being forced to drop out of school because of debt, and students graduating
and starting life with a high debt load.
Complaints from students
and parents in Maryland spurred several state legislators to introduce legislation
to address credit card marketing to students.1 No
legislation was enacted, and the hearings that were held to consider the legislation
left unanswered questions about the extent of credit card marketing on Maryland
public campuses and the policies, if any, of public colleges and universities
regarding credit card solicitation.
This report addresses those
unanswered questions, including:
• What type of credit card
marketing occurs on Maryland campuses?
• Do schools have policies
in place to prohibit or limit credit card marketing to students?
• Do schools sell their
students’ personal information to credit card issuers?
• Do colleges provide any
education to students about the proper use of credit cards?
The results of this survey
show that credit card marketing varies widely among Maryland colleges and universities.
Some schools prohibit credit card marketing on campus, some allow marketing
with certain restrictions, and others have no restrictions. Specific findings
include:
• Credit card vendors are
setting up tables on some campuses in violation of university policies prohibiting
or limiting tabling.
• At least two schools currently
sell their student lists (names, addresses and telephone numbers) to credit
card issuers.
• Several schools have exclusive
marketing agreements with one credit card issuer for which they receive financial
compensation.
• Only one school that allows
on-campus marketing has a comprehensive written policy specifically governing
credit card marketing.
• A few schools teach students
about credit card use and personal finance as part of student orientation.
• Most education about credit
cards and personal finance provided by schools is voluntary and few students
attend.
We recommend the following
actions be taken in order to address the problems and issues raised by credit
card marketing to college students.
• Colleges and universities
in Maryland should establish specific written policies with the input of students,
parents and administrators on credit card marketing to students.
• Colleges and universities
should be prohibited from selling students’ personal information to commercial
entities.
• Colleges and universities
should provide credit card education as a required part of freshman orientation.
The education should be provided by university personnel or by an independent
source, not a credit card issuer.
• Personal finance education
should be a graduation requirement for all Maryland high school seniors.
• Credit card issuers and
universities should crack down on unauthorized marketing on college campuses.
• Credit card issuers should
adopt more conservative lending policies for college students and should place
reasonable credit limits on accounts based on students’ income.
• Congress should enact
a national interest rate cap for credit cards, require higher minimum payments,
require disclosure of the length of time it will take to pay off an account
if only the minimum payment is made, place limits on late fees and penalty interest
rates, and prohibit penalty interest rates for late payments to other creditors.2
Notes
1 See page 15 of report
for discussion of legislation introduced in Maryland.
2 These reforms cannot
be enacted by the states because of federal preemption of many state laws regulating
banks. Demos: A Network of Ideas and Action, Borrowing to Make Ends Meet,
The Growth of Credit Card Debt in the ‘90’s, Sept. 2003, New York, New York,
p.33 to 35.
|